Supply Chain Risk Management: Strategies for Resilience in a Global Economy

Explore essential Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) strategies for today's global economy. Learn cutting-edge technologies, compliance practices, and industry-leading approaches to build resilient supply chains. Discover how to mitigate risks, from cybersecurity to climate change, and gain a competitive edge through robust SCRM implementation. Essential insights for supply chain professionals and business leaders navigating an uncertain business landscape.

SFK Inc. | SKK Marine | SFK SecCon. (2021, December 17). Supply Chain Risk Management: Strategies for Resilience in a Global Economy. Retrieved from https://sfkcorp.com/supply-chain-risk-management-strategies-for-resilience-in-a-global-economy/

Contents

Supply Chain Risk Management: Strategies for Resilience in a Global Economy

Abstract

This guide explores the critical domain of Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) in today’s complex global economy. It examines the evolving landscape of supply chain risks, from traditional disruptions to emerging challenges like cybersecurity threats and climate change impacts. The article presents a detailed analysis of key strategies for effective risk management, including supplier diversification, technological integration, and the development of resilient supply chain designs. It delves into cutting-edge technologies transforming SCRM, such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and Internet of Things (IoT) applications. The guide also addresses the crucial role of regulatory compliance in mitigating legal and reputational risks. Through case studies of industry leaders, it illustrates successful implementation of SCRM practices. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of building adaptive and resilient supply chains to maintain competitive advantage in an increasingly uncertain business environment. This resource serves as an essential reference for supply chain professionals, business leaders, and researchers seeking to enhance their understanding and implementation of robust SCRM practices.

Keywords:

Supply Chain Risk Management, SCRM, Supply Chain Resilience, Risk Mitigation Strategies, Global Supply Chains, Technological Integration, Regulatory Compliance, Supplier Diversification, Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chains, Blockchain, Internet of Things (IoT), Case Studies, Adaptive Supply Chains, Competitive Advantage, Cybersecurity in Supply Chains, Climate Change Impacts

Introduction

Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) has become an indispensable component of modern business strategy, particularly in today’s volatile global environment. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of SCRM, its importance, and key strategies for implementation.

Definition of Supply Chain Risk Management

Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) is a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks that could potentially disrupt the flow of goods, services, or information within a supply chain network. It encompasses a wide range of activities designed to enhance the resilience and adaptability of supply chains in the face of various internal and external threats.

Critical Importance of SCRM

In today’s interconnected global economy, the importance of SCRM cannot be overstated. 

Effective SCRM:

  • Helps businesses maintain operational continuity
  • Protects brand reputation
  • Ensures customer satisfaction
  • Safeguards financial performance

As supply chains become increasingly complex and global, the potential for disruptions has grown exponentially, making SCRM a critical function for organizations across industries.

Key Statistics on Supply Chain Disruptions

Recent data underscores the significant impact of supply chain disruptions:

  • According to a study by Deloitte, 79% of organizations with superior supply chain capabilities achieve revenue growth significantly above their industry average.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in global supply chains, with 94% of Fortune 1000 companies reporting supply chain disruptions in 2020
  • The average cost of a supply chain disruption is estimated to be $184 million per incident.

These statistics highlight the critical need for robust SCRM strategies in today’s business landscape.

Article Roadmap

This comprehensive guide will cover the following key areas of Supply Chain Risk Management:

  1. Understanding the landscape of supply chain risks
  2. The comprehensive process of SCRM
  3. Key strategies for effective SCRM implementation
  4. Cutting-edge technologies and tools in SCRM
  5. Building resilient and adaptive supply chains
  6. Regulatory compliance and risk management
  7. Future trends shaping SCRM
  8. Case studies showcasing successful SCRM implementations

By the end of this article, readers will have a thorough understanding of SCRM principles, strategies, and best practices to enhance their organization’s supply chain resilience and competitive advantage.

Understanding the Landscape of Supply Chain Risks

To effectively manage supply chain risks, it is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of the various types of risks that can impact supply chain operations. This section will explore the categorization of supply chain risks, emerging risks in modern supply chains, and industry-specific risk factors.

Categorization of Supply Chain Risks

Supply chain risks can be broadly classified into three main categories:

External Risks

External risks are those that originate from outside the organization and its supply chain network. These risks are often beyond the direct control of the company and can include:

  • Natural disasters: Earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and other extreme weather events can disrupt supply chains by damaging infrastructure, interrupting transportation, and affecting production facilities (Ivanov, 2020).
  • Geopolitical events: Trade wars, political instability, and changes in government regulations can impact global supply chains, affecting costs, lead times, and availability of materials (Manners-Bell, 2021).
  • Pandemics: As demonstrated by the COVID-19 outbreak, global health crises can cause widespread disruptions to supply chains, affecting production, transportation, and consumer demand (Golan et al., 2020).

Internal Risks

Internal risks arise from within the organization or its immediate supply chain partners. These can include:

  • Inventory issues: Poor inventory management can lead to stockouts or excess inventory, both of which can negatively impact the supply chain (Chopra & Meindl, 2021).
  • Quality control problems: Defects in products or components can lead to recalls, reputational damage, and supply chain disruptions (Zsidisin & Henke, 2019).
  • Cybersecurity threats: Data breaches and cyber-attacks can compromise sensitive information and disrupt supply chain operations (Bartol, 2014).

Network Risks

Network risks stem from the interactions between different entities within the supply chain network. Examples include:

  • Supplier bankruptcy: The financial failure of a key supplier can cause significant disruptions to the supply chain (Simchi-Levi et al., 2019).
  • Transportation delays: Issues with logistics providers or transportation infrastructure can lead to delays and increased costs (Tang, 2006).
  • Demand volatility: Sudden changes in customer demand can create ripple effects throughout the supply chain (Christopher & Peck, 2004).

Emerging Risks in Modern Supply Chains

As supply chains evolve, new risks continue to emerge:

Cybersecurity Threats and Data Breaches

With the increasing digitization of supply chains, cybersecurity has become a critical concern. Cyber-attacks can disrupt operations, compromise sensitive data, and damage reputations (Linton et al., 2019).

Climate Change Impacts and Sustainability Challenges

Climate change poses significant risks to supply chains, including increased frequency of extreme weather events and potential disruptions to agricultural production. Additionally, growing consumer and regulatory pressure for sustainable practices presents both risks and opportunities for supply chain management (Dasaklis & Pappis, 2013).

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerability of global supply chains to health crises. Long-term effects may include shifts in consumer behavior, changes in supply chain design, and increased focus on resilience and flexibility (Ivanov & Dolgui, 2020).

Industry-Specific Risk Factors

While many supply chain risks are common across industries, certain sectors face unique challenges:

  • Automotive: Just-in-time manufacturing practices can increase vulnerability to supply disruptions (Thun & Hoenig, 2011).
  • Pharmaceuticals: Strict regulatory requirements and the potential for counterfeit products present significant risks (Enyinda et al., 2010).
  • Electronics: Rapid technological changes and short product lifecycles can lead to inventory obsolescence risks (Lee, 2002).
  • Food and beverage: Perishability of products and food safety concerns create unique supply chain challenges (Diabat et al., 2012).

Understanding these diverse risk factors is the first step in developing a comprehensive supply chain risk management strategy. By identifying potential threats across external, internal, and network dimensions, as well as considering emerging and industry-specific risks, organizations can better prepare for and mitigate supply chain disruptions.

The Comprehensive Process of Supply Chain Risk Management

Effective Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) is a systematic and continuous process that involves several key steps. This section outlines the comprehensive approach to SCRM, detailing each phase of the process.

Risk Identification Techniques

The first step in SCRM is identifying potential risks that could impact the supply chain. Various techniques can be employed for this purpose:

Supply Chain Mapping

Creating a visual representation of the entire supply chain helps identify vulnerable points and potential risk sources (Gardner & Cooper, 2003). This technique involves:

  • Documenting all suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, and logistics providers
  • Identifying critical paths and potential bottlenecks
  • Highlighting geographical concentrations of supply chain activities

PESTLE Analysis

PESTLE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental) analysis helps identify external factors that could pose risks to the supply chain (Yüksel, 2012). This framework encourages a holistic view of the business environment.

Brainstorming and Expert Interviews

Engaging supply chain professionals and industry experts in brainstorming sessions can uncover risks that may not be immediately apparent through other methods (Manuj & Mentzer, 2008).

Risk Assessment and Prioritization Methodologies

Once risks are identified, they need to be assessed and prioritized to allocate resources effectively.

Probability-Impact Matrix

This tool assesses risks based on their likelihood of occurrence and potential impact on the supply chain (Hallikas et al., 2004). Risks are typically categorized as:

  • High probability, high impact: Require immediate attention
  • Low probability, high impact: Need contingency plans
  • High probability, low impact: May require operational changes
  • Low probability, low impact: May be monitored but are lower priority

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

FMEA is a systematic approach to identifying potential failures in a system or process. In SCRM, it helps prioritize risks based on their severity, occurrence, and detectability (Curkovic et al., 2013).

Quantitative Risk Assessment

This approach uses statistical methods and historical data to quantify the potential financial impact of various risks. Techniques may include Monte Carlo simulations or Value at Risk (VaR) calculations (Heckmann et al., 2015).

Developing Robust Risk Mitigation Strategies

After assessing and prioritizing risks, the next step is to develop strategies to mitigate them.

Risk Avoidance

This strategy involves eliminating the risk by changing the supply chain design or avoiding certain activities altogether (Manuj & Mentzer, 2008).

Risk Reduction

Implementing measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of risks, such as improving forecasting methods or implementing quality control measures (Tang, 2006).

Risk Transfer

Shifting the risk to another party through insurance, contracts, or financial instruments (Blome & Schoenherr, 2011).

Risk Acceptance

For low-impact or low-probability risks, a conscious decision may be made to accept the risk and its potential consequences (Zsidisin & Ritchie, 2009).

Implementing Risk Management Measures Across the Organization

Effective SCRM requires organization-wide implementation and buy-in.

Cross-Functional Collaboration

Establishing cross-functional teams ensures that risk management strategies are implemented consistently across different departments (Jüttner et al., 2003).

Training and Awareness Programs

Educating employees at all levels about supply chain risks and mitigation strategies is crucial for successful implementation (Peck, 2006).

Integration with Existing Systems

Incorporating risk management processes into existing supply chain management systems and workflows ensures consistent application (Tummala & Schoenherr, 2011).

Continuous Monitoring, Review, and Improvement

SCRM is an ongoing process that requires regular monitoring and refinement.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Establishing and tracking KPIs related to supply chain risk helps measure the effectiveness of risk management strategies (Gunasekaran et al., 2004).

Regular Risk Assessments

Conducting periodic risk assessments helps identify new risks and evaluate the effectiveness of existing mitigation strategies (Zsidisin et al., 2004).

Lessons Learned and Best Practices

Documenting and sharing lessons learned from risk events and near-misses can improve future risk management efforts (Jüttner & Maklan, 2011).

Continuous Improvement Cycle

Implementing a continuous improvement cycle, such as the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, ensures that the SCRM process evolves and improves over time (Deming, 1986).By following this comprehensive process, organizations can develop a robust SCRM framework that enhances supply chain resilience and adaptability. The key lies in maintaining a proactive and systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks across the entire supply chain network.

10 Key Strategies for Effective Supply Chain Risk Management

Implementing a robust Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) system requires a multifaceted approach. The following ten strategies represent best practices that organizations can adopt to enhance their supply chain resilience and mitigate potential risks.

1. Diversification of Suppliers and Sourcing Locations

Relying on a single supplier or sourcing from a single geographic location can expose a company to significant risk. Diversification helps mitigate this risk by:

  • Reducing dependency on any single source
  • Providing alternatives in case of disruptions
  • Potentially lowering costs through competitive pricing

Research by Chopra and Sodhi (2004) suggests that companies with diversified supplier bases are better equipped to handle supply chain disruptions.

2. Building Flexibility and Agility into Supply Chain Design

A flexible and agile supply chain can quickly adapt to changing circumstances and unforeseen events. Key elements include:

  • Modular product designs that allow for easy substitution of components
  • Flexible manufacturing processes that can switch between products quickly
  • Agile logistics networks capable of rerouting shipments as needed

Christopher and Peck (2004) argue that supply chain flexibility is crucial for resilience in the face of disruptions.

3. Implementing Advanced Inventory Management Systems

Effective inventory management is critical for balancing supply and demand while minimizing risk. Advanced systems can help by:

  • Optimizing stock levels to reduce both stockouts and excess inventory
  • Implementing just-in-time (JIT) practices where appropriate
  • Utilizing safety stock strategically for critical components

According to Zsidisin and Ritchie (2009), sophisticated inventory management systems are essential for managing supply chain risks effectively.

4. Enhancing End-to-End Visibility and Transparency

Improved visibility across the entire supply chain enables better decision-making and faster response to potential disruptions. This can be achieved through:

  • Implementing track-and-trace technologies
  • Utilizing supply chain control towers for real-time monitoring
  • Sharing information with suppliers and partners

Bartlett et al. (2007) emphasize that enhanced visibility is crucial for identifying and mitigating supply chain risks.

5. Developing Strong Supplier Relationships and Collaboration

Strong, collaborative relationships with suppliers can lead to:

  • Better communication and information sharing
  • Joint risk management initiatives
  • Improved quality control and problem-solving

Research by Chen et al. (2013) shows that collaborative supplier relationships contribute significantly to supply chain resilience.

6. Utilizing Predictive Analytics and AI for Risk Forecasting

Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence can help organizations:

  • Identify potential risks before they materialize
  • Forecast demand more accurately
  • Optimize supply chain operations in real-time

Trkman et al. (2016) highlight the growing importance of analytics in supply chain risk management.

7. Implementing Robust Cybersecurity Measures

As supply chains become increasingly digitized, cybersecurity is paramount. Key measures include:

  • Regular security audits and penetration testing
  • Employee training on cybersecurity best practices
  • Implementing secure, encrypted communication channels with suppliers and partners

Linton et al. (2019) emphasize the critical role of cybersecurity in protecting modern supply chains.

8. Developing and Regularly Updating Contingency Plans

Comprehensive contingency plans help organizations respond quickly and effectively to disruptions. These plans should:

  • Address various risk scenarios
  • Be regularly tested and updated
  • Involve key stakeholders across the organization and supply chain

Kleindorfer and Saad (2005) argue that effective contingency planning is essential for supply chain risk management.

9. Focusing on Sustainability and Ethical Sourcing

Incorporating sustainability and ethical considerations into supply chain management can:

  • Mitigate reputational risks
  • Ensure compliance with evolving regulations
  • Meet growing consumer demand for responsible business practices

Carter and Rogers (2008) demonstrate that sustainable supply chain management practices can contribute to long-term risk reduction and improved performance.

10. Integrating Risk Management with Overall Business Strategy

SCRM should not be viewed as a standalone function but as an integral part of overall business strategy. This integration ensures:

  • Alignment of risk management with business objectives
  • Support from top management
  • Allocation of necessary resources for risk management initiatives

According to Manuj and Mentzer (2008), integrating risk management with business strategy is crucial for effective SCRM implementation.

By implementing these ten key strategies, organizations can significantly enhance their supply chain risk management capabilities. However, it’s important to note that the effectiveness of these strategies may vary depending on the specific industry, company size, and supply chain complexity. Regular assessment and adaptation of these strategies are necessary to ensure they remain relevant and effective in the face of evolving supply chain risks.

Cutting-edge Technology and Tools in Supply Chain Risk Management

The rapid advancement of technology has revolutionized Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM), offering new tools and approaches to identify, assess, and mitigate risks more effectively. This section explores some of the most innovative technologies being applied in SCRM today.

AI and Machine Learning Applications

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are transforming SCRM by enabling more sophisticated risk analysis and prediction.

Predictive Risk Analytics

AI-powered predictive analytics can forecast potential supply chain disruptions by analyzing vast amounts of data from various sources, including:

  • Historical supply chain performance data
  • Weather patterns and natural disaster probabilities
  • Geopolitical events and economic indicators
  • Social media trends and news feeds

These systems can identify patterns and correlations that humans might miss, allowing organizations to anticipate and prepare for potential risks proactively (Baryannis et al., 2019).

Automated Risk Assessment and Prioritization

Machine learning algorithms can automatically assess and prioritize risks based on multiple factors, such as:

  • Probability of occurrence
  • Potential impact on operations
  • Historical data on similar events
  • Current supply chain conditions

This automation helps organizations allocate resources more efficiently and focus on the most critical risks (Ivanov & Dolgui, 2020).

Blockchain for Improved Traceability and Transparency

Blockchain technology offers a decentralized, tamper-resistant ledger that can significantly enhance supply chain transparency and traceability.

Key benefits of blockchain in SCRM include:

  • Enhanced visibility of product movement and ownership throughout the supply chain
  • Improved authentication and verification of products, reducing the risk of counterfeits
  • Increased trust among supply chain partners through shared, immutable records

Saberi et al. (2019) highlight that blockchain can help organizations quickly identify the source of quality issues or contaminations, facilitating faster recalls and reducing reputational risks.

Internet of Things (IoT) for Real-time Monitoring and Early Warning Systems

IoT devices provide real-time data on various aspects of the supply chain, enabling more effective risk monitoring and management.

Applications of IoT in SCRM include:

  • Real-time tracking of shipments and inventory levels
  • Monitoring of environmental conditions for sensitive goods
  • Predictive maintenance for manufacturing equipment and vehicles

Ben-Daya et al. (2019) argue that IoT technologies can significantly improve supply chain visibility and enable faster response to potential disruptions.

Advanced Analytics and Big Data for Decision Support

The combination of big data and advanced analytics provides powerful tools for supply chain risk management.

Key capabilities include:

  • Scenario modeling and simulation to assess potential risk impacts
  • Network optimization to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities
  • Demand forecasting to reduce inventory risks

According to Tiwari et al. (2018), big data analytics can help organizations make more informed decisions about supply chain risks and optimize their risk mitigation strategies.

Cloud-based Supply Chain Management Systems for Enhanced Collaboration

Cloud-based systems facilitate better collaboration and information sharing among supply chain partners, which is crucial for effective risk management.

Benefits of cloud-based SCRM systems include:

  • Real-time sharing of risk-related information across the supply chain
  • Improved coordination of risk mitigation efforts
  • Scalability and flexibility to adapt to changing supply chain needs

Shee et al. (2018) emphasize that cloud-based systems can significantly enhance supply chain agility and resilience in the face of disruptions.

Digital Twins for Supply Chain Simulation and Optimization

Digital twins are virtual replicas of physical supply chains that allow organizations to simulate various scenarios and optimize their operations.

Applications in SCRM include:

  • Testing the impact of potential disruptions on supply chain performance
  • Optimizing inventory levels and distribution networks
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of different risk mitigation strategies

Ivanov and Dolgui (2021) argue that digital twins can provide valuable insights for building more resilient and adaptive supply chains.

Natural Language Processing (NLP) for Risk Intelligence

NLP technologies can analyze vast amounts of unstructured data from news sources, social media, and other text-based information to identify potential supply chain risks.

Key capabilities include:

  • Early detection of emerging risks through sentiment analysis
  • Monitoring of supplier-related news and events
  • Automated extraction of relevant risk information from various sources

According to Zhu et al. (2019), NLP can significantly enhance an organization’s ability to gather and process risk-related information from diverse sources.

These cutting-edge technologies and tools are reshaping the landscape of Supply Chain Risk Management, offering unprecedented capabilities for risk identification, assessment, and mitigation. However, it’s important to note that successful implementation requires not only technological investment but also organizational readiness and a strategic approach to integration with existing processes. As these technologies continue to evolve, they promise to further enhance the resilience and adaptability of global supply chains.

Building a Resilient and Adaptive Supply Chain

In today’s volatile business environment, building a resilient and adaptive supply chain is crucial for long-term success. This section explores key strategies and practices that organizations can implement to enhance their supply chain’s ability to withstand disruptions and quickly adapt to changing circumstances.

Fostering a Risk-Aware Culture Within the Organization

Creating a risk-aware culture is fundamental to building a resilient supply chain. This involves:

Leadership Commitment

Top management must demonstrate a clear commitment to risk management and allocate necessary resources (Christopher & Peck, 2004).

Employee Training and Empowerment

Regular training programs should be conducted to ensure all employees understand their role in managing supply chain risks. Empowering employees to make decisions and take action when risks are identified can significantly improve response times (Ponomarov & Holcomb, 2009).

Cross-Functional Collaboration

Encouraging collaboration between different departments (e.g., procurement, logistics, finance) can lead to more comprehensive risk identification and mitigation strategies (Jüttner & Maklan, 2011).

Developing and Maintaining Comprehensive Contingency Plans

Effective contingency planning is essential for rapid response to supply chain disruptions. Key elements include:

Scenario Planning

Identify potential disruption scenarios and develop specific response plans for each (Chopra & Sodhi, 2004).

Clear Communication Protocols

Establish clear lines of communication and decision-making processes to be activated during a crisis (Scholten et al., 2014).

Regular Plan Updates and Testing

Contingency plans should be regularly reviewed, updated, and tested to ensure their effectiveness (Kleindorfer & Saad, 2005).

Regular Stress Testing and Scenario Planning Methodologies

Stress testing helps organizations identify vulnerabilities in their supply chains and assess their ability to respond to disruptions.

Supply Chain Network Analysis

Use network modeling tools to identify critical nodes and potential bottlenecks in the supply chain (Craighead et al., 2007).

Simulation Exercises

Conduct regular simulation exercises to test the organization’s response to various disruption scenarios (Ivanov et al., 2017).

Quantitative Risk Assessment

Employ quantitative methods, such as Monte Carlo simulations, to assess the potential impact of various risks on supply chain performance (Heckmann et al., 2015).

Learning from Past Disruptions and Implementing Lessons Learned

Organizations can significantly enhance their resilience by systematically learning from past experiences.

Post-Disruption Analysis

Conduct thorough analyses of past disruptions to identify what worked well and areas for improvement (Pettit et al., 2010).

Knowledge Management Systems

Implement systems to capture and share lessons learned across the organization (Blackhurst et al., 2011).

Continuous Improvement Process

Establish a formal process for incorporating lessons learned into existing risk management strategies and contingency plans (Jüttner & Maklan, 2011).

Balancing Efficiency with Resilience in Supply Chain Design

While efficiency is important, organizations must also prioritize resilience in their supply chain design.

Strategic Redundancy

Maintain strategic redundancies in critical areas of the supply chain, such as key suppliers or distribution centers (Sheffi & Rice Jr, 2005).

Flexible Capacity

Design supply chains with flexible capacity that can be quickly ramped up or down in response to disruptions (Tang & Tomlin, 2008).

Multi-Sourcing Strategies

Implement multi-sourcing strategies for critical components to reduce dependency on single suppliers (Chopra & Sodhi, 2004).

Postponement Strategies

Adopt postponement strategies to delay product differentiation, allowing for greater flexibility in responding to demand changes (Yang et al., 2004).

Embracing Digital Transformation for Enhanced Resilience

Digital technologies can significantly enhance supply chain resilience and adaptability.

End-to-End Visibility

Implement technologies that provide real-time visibility across the entire supply chain, enabling faster detection and response to disruptions (Dubey et al., 2021).

Predictive Analytics

Utilize advanced analytics and AI to predict potential disruptions and optimize response strategies (Ivanov & Dolgui, 2020).

Digital Twins

Develop digital twins of the supply chain to simulate various scenarios and optimize resilience strategies (Ivanov & Dolgui, 2021).

Cultivating Strong Supplier Relationships

Strong, collaborative relationships with suppliers can significantly enhance supply chain resilience.

Supplier Development Programs

Invest in supplier development programs to improve their capabilities and resilience (Krause et al., 2007).

Information Sharing

Establish mechanisms for regular information sharing with key suppliers to improve visibility and coordination (Cao & Zhang, 2011).

Joint Risk Management Initiatives

Collaborate with suppliers on risk management initiatives to create a more resilient supply network (Chen et al., 2013).

Building a resilient and adaptive supply chain requires a holistic approach that addresses organizational culture, processes, and technologies. By implementing these strategies, organizations can enhance their ability to withstand disruptions and quickly adapt to changing circumstances. However, it’s important to note that building resilience is an ongoing process that requires continuous evaluation and improvement. As the business environment evolves, so too must an organization’s approach to supply chain resilience.

Regulatory Compliance and Risk Management

In the complex landscape of global supply chains, regulatory compliance has become an integral part of risk management. This section explores the intricate relationship between regulatory compliance and supply chain risk management, highlighting key regulations, the role of compliance in mitigating risks, and strategies for ensuring compliance across global operations.

Overview of Key Regulations and Standards Affecting Supply Chains

Supply chains are subject to a myriad of regulations and standards that vary across industries and geographical regions. Some of the most significant include:

International Trade Regulations

  • Customs regulations: Govern the movement of goods across borders, including tariffs, quotas, and documentation requirements (Grainger, 2014).
  • Export control regulations: Such as the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which control the export of sensitive technologies and products (Thomsen & Whelan, 2014).

Environmental Regulations

  • EU Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive: Mandates the proper disposal and recycling of electronic products (Ongondo et al., 2011).
  • Carbon emissions regulations: Such as the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in various industries (Ellerman & Buchner, 2007).

Product Safety and Quality Standards

  • ISO 9001: International standard for quality management systems (Sampaio et al., 2009).
  • FDA regulations: For food and pharmaceutical products, ensuring safety and efficacy (Handfield & Nichols, 2004).

Labor and Human Rights Standards

  • International Labour Organization (ILO) standards: Promoting decent work conditions globally (Locke et al., 2007).
  • California Transparency in Supply Chains Act: Requires companies to disclose efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their supply chains (Pickles & Zhu, 2013).

Data Protection and Privacy Regulations

  • General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): EU regulation on data protection and privacy (Tikkinen-Piri et al., 2018).
  • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): Enhances privacy rights and consumer protection for California residents (Mulligan et al., 2019).

Regulatory compliance plays a crucial role in mitigating various risks associated with supply chain operations:

Compliance helps organizations avoid legal penalties, fines, and potential lawsuits resulting from regulatory violations (Zsidisin & Ritchie, 2009).

Reputational Risks

Adherence to regulations and ethical standards protects brand reputation and maintains stakeholder trust (Lemke & Petersen, 2013).

Operational Risks

Compliance often leads to improved processes and quality control, reducing operational risks and enhancing overall supply chain performance (Manuj & Mentzer, 2008).

Financial Risks

By avoiding penalties and maintaining stakeholder confidence, compliance contributes to financial stability and potentially lower insurance costs (Tang, 2006).

Strategies for Ensuring Regulatory Compliance Across Global Operations

Ensuring compliance across global supply chains requires a comprehensive and proactive approach:

Develop a Robust Compliance Management System

Implement a structured system for identifying, monitoring, and managing regulatory requirements across all relevant jurisdictions (Foerstl et al., 2010).

Conduct Regular Risk Assessments

Perform periodic assessments to identify potential compliance risks in the supply chain and prioritize mitigation efforts (Giannakis & Papadopoulos, 2016).

Implement Supplier Code of Conduct

Develop and enforce a supplier code of conduct that aligns with regulatory requirements and ethical standards (Jiang, 2009).

Utilize Technology for Compliance Monitoring

Leverage advanced technologies such as blockchain and AI to enhance traceability and automate compliance monitoring (Saberi et al., 2019).

Provide Comprehensive Training and Education

Ensure that employees and suppliers are well-informed about relevant regulations and compliance requirements through regular training programs (Giunipero & Eltantawy, 2004).

Conduct Regular Audits and Inspections

Implement a program of regular audits and inspections to verify compliance across the supply chain (Handfield & McCormack, 2007).

Establish Clear Communication Channels

Create open lines of communication with suppliers, regulators, and other stakeholders to stay informed about changing regulations and potential compliance issues (Chen et al., 2013).

Develop a Culture of Compliance

Foster a organizational culture that prioritizes ethical behavior and regulatory compliance at all levels of the supply chain (Paine, 1994).

Collaborate with Industry Partners

Participate in industry associations and collaborative initiatives to share best practices and collectively address compliance challenges (Lund-Thomsen & Lindgreen, 2014).

Stay Informed About Regulatory Changes

Establish a system for monitoring and anticipating regulatory changes that may impact the supply chain (Zsidisin & Ritchie, 2009).

Regulatory compliance is an essential component of effective supply chain risk management. By understanding the regulatory landscape, recognizing the role of compliance in risk mitigation, and implementing comprehensive strategies for ensuring compliance, organizations can significantly enhance their supply chain resilience and sustainability. As regulations continue to evolve and become more complex, maintaining a proactive and adaptive approach to compliance will be crucial for long-term success in global supply chain management.

Case Studies: Success Stories in Supply Chain Risk Management

Examining real-world examples of successful supply chain risk management can provide valuable insights and inspiration for organizations looking to enhance their own practices. This section presents several case studies that highlight effective strategies and best practices in supply chain risk management.

Case Study 1: Procter & Gamble’s Control Tower Approach

Procter & Gamble (P&G), a multinational consumer goods corporation, implemented a “control tower” approach to enhance visibility and risk management across its complex global supply chain.

Implementation:

P&G established a centralized control tower that integrates data from various sources, including suppliers, manufacturing plants, and distribution centers. This system provides real-time visibility into inventory levels, production schedules, and potential disruptions (Banker, 2016).

Results:

  • Improved forecast accuracy by 20%
  • Reduced inventory levels by 10%
  • Enhanced ability to respond quickly to supply chain disruptions

Key Takeaway:

Centralized visibility and data integration can significantly improve supply chain resilience and responsiveness to potential risks.

Case Study 2: Toyota’s RESCUE System

Toyota Motor Corporation developed the RESCUE (REinforce Supply Chain Under Emergency) system to manage supply chain risks in the aftermath of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan.

Implementation:

The RESCUE system maps out Toyota’s entire supply chain, including tier 2 and tier 3 suppliers, and simulates various disruption scenarios to identify vulnerabilities (Matsuo, 2015).

Results:

  • Reduced recovery time from major disruptions by 50%
  • Improved identification of critical suppliers and components
  • Enhanced ability to develop targeted risk mitigation strategies

Key Takeaway:

Comprehensive supply chain mapping and scenario planning can significantly improve an organization’s ability to respond to and recover from major disruptions.

Case Study 3: Cisco’s Risk Management Framework

Cisco Systems implemented a comprehensive risk management framework to address potential disruptions in its global supply chain.

Implementation:

Cisco developed a multi-layered approach that includes:

  • Supplier risk assessments
  • Business continuity planning
  • Incident management processes
  • Supply chain redesign for resilience (Harrington & O’Connor, 2009)

Results:

  • Reduced average time to recovery from disruptions by 75%
  • Improved supplier performance and reliability
  • Enhanced overall supply chain resilience

Key Takeaway:

A holistic approach to risk management that addresses multiple layers of the supply chain can lead to significant improvements in resilience and performance.

Case Study 4: Unilever’s Supplier Collaboration Program

Unilever implemented a comprehensive supplier collaboration program to enhance sustainability and reduce risks in its supply chain.

Implementation:

The program focuses on:

  • Supplier capacity building
  • Collaborative innovation
  • Sustainability initiatives
  • Transparent information sharing (Unilever, 2020)

Results:

  • 62% of agricultural raw materials sourced sustainably by 2019
  • Reduced supply chain risks related to environmental and social factors
  • Improved supplier relationships and performance

Key Takeaway:

Collaborative relationships with suppliers can lead to improved sustainability, reduced risks, and enhanced overall supply chain performance.

Case Study 5: Intel’s Multi-Factory Loading Strategy

Intel Corporation implemented a multi-factory loading strategy to mitigate risks associated with geographic concentration of manufacturing facilities.

Implementation:

Intel developed the capability to manufacture its products at multiple locations, allowing for quick shifts in production in case of disruptions at any single site (Simchi-Levi et al., 2014).

Results:

  • Increased flexibility in responding to natural disasters and other localized disruptions
  • Improved overall supply chain resilience
  • Reduced impact of potential disruptions on customer service levels

Key Takeaway:

Geographic diversification of manufacturing capabilities can significantly enhance supply chain resilience and flexibility.

Lessons Learned and Best Practices from Industry Leaders

These case studies highlight several key best practices in supply chain risk management:

  1. Enhance Visibility: Implementing systems that provide real-time visibility across the entire supply chain is crucial for effective risk management.
  2. Scenario Planning: Regularly conducting scenario planning and simulations can help identify vulnerabilities and improve response strategies.
  3. Holistic Approach: Adopting a comprehensive risk management framework that addresses multiple layers of the supply chain leads to improved resilience.
  4. Supplier Collaboration: Building strong, collaborative relationships with suppliers can enhance sustainability and reduce risks.
  5. Flexibility and Redundancy: Developing flexible manufacturing capabilities and building strategic redundancies into the supply chain can significantly improve resilience.
  6. Continuous Improvement: Regularly reviewing and updating risk management strategies based on past experiences and changing conditions is essential for long-term success.
  7. Technology Integration: Leveraging advanced technologies for data analysis, visibility, and decision-making support is increasingly important in modern supply chain risk management.

By studying and adapting these successful strategies, organizations can enhance their own supply chain risk management practices and build more resilient and adaptive supply chains. It’s important to note, however, that each organization’s specific context and challenges may require tailored approaches to risk management.

Summary

Recap of Key Strategies and Technologies in SCRM

As we have explored throughout this comprehensive guide, Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) has become an indispensable component of modern business strategy. The increasing complexity and global nature of supply chains, coupled with the ever-evolving landscape of risks, necessitate a proactive and holistic approach to risk management.

This article has highlighted several crucial strategies and technologies that organizations can leverage to enhance their supply chain resilience:

Strategic Approaches:

  • Diversification of suppliers and sourcing locations
  • Building flexibility and agility into supply chain design
  • Developing strong supplier relationships and collaboration
  • Integrating risk management with overall business strategy
  • Fostering a risk-aware culture within the organization

Technological Advancements:

  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for predictive risk analytics
  • Blockchain for improved traceability and transparency
  • Internet of Things (IoT) for real-time monitoring and early warning systems
  • Advanced analytics and big data for decision support
  • Cloud-based supply chain management systems for enhanced collaboration

These strategies and technologies, when effectively implemented, can significantly enhance an organization’s ability to identify, assess, and mitigate supply chain risks (Ivanov & Dolgui, 2020; Tiwari et al., 2018).

The Critical Role of SCRM in Ensuring Business Continuity and Competitive Advantage

In today’s volatile business environment, effective SCRM is not just about mitigating risks; it’s a key driver of competitive advantage. Organizations that excel in SCRM are better positioned to:

  • Maintain operational continuity in the face of disruptions
  • Respond quickly and effectively to changing market conditions
  • Enhance customer satisfaction through reliable service
  • Protect brand reputation and stakeholder trust
  • Optimize costs and improve overall supply chain efficiency

Research by Wieland and Wallenburg (2012) demonstrates that robust SCRM practices contribute significantly to both customer value and business performance.

Call to Action: Steps for Businesses to Enhance Their Supply Chain Resilience

To improve supply chain resilience, organizations should consider the following steps:

  1. Conduct a Comprehensive Risk Assessment: Identify and prioritize potential risks across the entire supply chain.
  2. Develop a Holistic SCRM Strategy: Integrate risk management into overall business strategy and supply chain design.
  3. Invest in Technology: Leverage cutting-edge technologies to enhance visibility, prediction, and response capabilities.
  4. Foster Collaboration: Build strong relationships with suppliers and partners to create a more resilient supply network.
  5. Implement Continuous Monitoring and Improvement: Regularly review and update risk management strategies based on new insights and changing conditions.
  6. Develop Talent and Culture: Invest in training and fostering a risk-aware culture throughout the organization.
  7. Learn from Others: Study best practices and success stories from industry leaders to inform your own SCRM strategies.

As emphasized by Christopher and Peck (2004), building supply chain resilience is an ongoing process that requires commitment, resources, and a willingness to adapt to changing circumstances.

As supply chains continue to evolve and face new challenges, the importance of effective Supply Chain Risk Management will only grow. Organizations that prioritize SCRM and invest in building resilient, adaptive supply chains will be better positioned to navigate uncertainties, overcome disruptions, and thrive in an increasingly complex global business environment. By embracing the strategies, technologies, and best practices outlined in this guide, businesses can enhance their supply chain resilience and gain a significant competitive advantage in the marketplace.

FAQs on Supply Chain Risk Management

To address common concerns and provide additional clarity on Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM), we’ve compiled a list of frequently asked questions. These answers aim to provide concise yet informative insights into key aspects of SCRM.

What is Supply Chain Risk Management?

Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) is a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks that could potentially disrupt the flow of goods, services, or information within a supply chain network. It involves strategies and practices designed to enhance the resilience and adaptability of supply chains in the face of various internal and external threats (Manuj & Mentzer, 2008).

Why is Supply Chain Risk Management important?

SCRM is crucial because:

  • It helps maintain operational continuity during disruptions
  • It protects brand reputation and customer satisfaction
  • It can lead to cost savings by preventing or minimizing the impact of disruptions
  • It enhances overall supply chain performance and competitiveness
  • It helps companies comply with regulatory requirements

Research by Hendricks and Singhal (2005) shows that supply chain disruptions can lead to significant long-term negative effects on shareholder value, emphasizing the importance of effective risk management.

What are the main types of supply chain risks?

The main categories of supply chain risks include:

  • External risks (e.g., natural disasters, geopolitical events)
  • Internal risks (e.g., inventory issues, quality control problems)
  • Network risks (e.g., supplier bankruptcy, transportation delays)
  • Emerging risks (e.g., cybersecurity threats, climate change impacts)

Chopra and Sodhi (2004) provide a comprehensive classification of supply chain risks in their seminal work.

How can technology improve Supply Chain Risk Management?

Technology can enhance SCRM through:

  • Improved visibility and real-time monitoring (IoT, blockchain)
  • Advanced predictive analytics (AI and machine learning)
  • Enhanced collaboration and information sharing (cloud-based systems)
  • Automated risk assessment and prioritization
  • Simulation and scenario planning (digital twins)

Ivanov and Dolgui (2020) discuss the transformative potential of digital technologies in SCRM.

What is the difference between risk mitigation and risk transfer in SCRM?

Risk mitigation involves taking actions to reduce the likelihood or impact of a potential risk. Examples include diversifying suppliers or implementing quality control measures.

Risk transfer involves shifting the potential impact of a risk to another party, typically through insurance or contractual agreements.Both strategies play important roles in comprehensive SCRM (Tang, 2006).

How can small businesses implement effective SCRM with limited resources?

Small businesses can:

  • Start with a simple risk assessment to identify key vulnerabilities
  • Focus on building strong relationships with key suppliers
  • Implement basic contingency plans for the most critical risks
  • Leverage cloud-based tools for improved visibility and collaboration
  • Join industry associations to share best practices and resources

Thun et al. (2011) provide insights into SCRM practices for small and medium-sized enterprises.

How often should a company review and update its SCRM strategies?

Companies should review their SCRM strategies:

  • Annually as part of regular business planning
  • After any significant supply chain disruption
  • When entering new markets or introducing new products
  • In response to major changes in the business environment

Continuous monitoring and periodic reviews are essential for maintaining effective SCRM (Zsidisin & Ritchie, 2009).

What role does supplier relationship management play in SCRM?

Supplier relationship management is crucial for SCRM as it:

  • Enhances visibility into potential risks at the supplier level
  • Facilitates collaboration on risk mitigation strategies
  • Improves communication during disruptions
  • Can lead to joint investments in risk reduction initiatives

Chen et al. (2013) emphasize the importance of collaborative relationships in enhancing supply chain resilience.

How can companies measure the effectiveness of their SCRM efforts?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) for SCRM effectiveness may include:

  • Time to recover from disruptions
  • Frequency and severity of supply chain incidents
  • Cost savings from prevented disruptions
  • Supplier performance and reliability metrics
  • Customer satisfaction levels

Neiger et al. (2009) discuss various approaches to measuring supply chain risk management performance.

What are some common challenges in implementing SCRM, and how can they be overcome?

Common challenges include:

  • Lack of top management support: Overcome by demonstrating the ROI of SCRM
  • Limited resources: Address by prioritizing critical risks and leveraging technology
  • Resistance to change: Mitigate through education and cultural change initiatives
  • Complexity of global supply chains: Manage by focusing on key nodes and implementing advanced visibility tools
  • Difficulty in quantifying risks: Improve through better data collection and analysis techniques

Sodhi et al. (2012) provide a comprehensive review of SCRM challenges and potential solutions.

By addressing these frequently asked questions, we hope to provide a clearer understanding of Supply Chain Risk Management and its critical role in modern business operations. As the field continues to evolve, staying informed about best practices and emerging trends in SCRM will be essential for maintaining competitive advantage in an increasingly complex global marketplace.

References

  • Banker, S. (2016). Procter & Gamble’s supply chain control tower. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevebanker/2016/05/23/procter-gambles-supply-chain-control-tower/
  • Baryannis, G., Validi, S., Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. (2019). Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: State of the art and future research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2179-2202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1530476
  • Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019). Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15-16), 4719-4742. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140
  • Blackhurst, J., Dunn, K. S., & Craighead, C. W. (2011). An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(4), 374-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0000-0000.2011.01032.x
  • Blome, C., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Supply chain risk management in financial crises—A multiple case-study approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.01.002
  • Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008
  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
  • Chen, J., Sohal, A. S., & Prajogo, D. I. (2013). Supply chain operational risk mitigation: A collaborative approach. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), 2186-2199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.727490
  • Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2021). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53-61.
  • Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275
  • Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x
  • Curkovic, S., Scannell, T., & Wagner, B. (2013). Using FMEA for supply chain risk management. Modern Management Science & Engineering, 1(2), 251-265.
  • Dasaklis, T. K., & Pappis, C. P. (2013). Supply chain management in view of climate change: An overview of possible impacts and the road ahead. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(4), 1124-1138. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.883
  • Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
  • Diabat, A., Govindan, K., & Panicker, V. V. (2012). Supply chain risk management and its mitigation in a food industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 3039-3050. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.588619
  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Luo, Z., & Roubaud, D. (2021). Upstream supply chain visibility and complexity effect on focal company’s sustainable performance: Indian manufacturers’ perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 290(1), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2544-x
  • Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, B. K. (2007). The European Union emissions trading scheme: Origins, allocation, and early results. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem003
  • Enyinda, C. I., Mbah, C. H. N., & Ogbuehi, A. (2010). An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing-country perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20309
  • Foerstl, K., Reuter, C., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment—Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(2), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2010.03.011
  • Gardner, J. T., & Cooper, M. C. (2003). Strategic supply chain mapping approaches. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(2), 37-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00045.x
  • Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.032
  • Giunipero, L. C., & Eltantawy, R. A. (2004). Securing the upstream supply chain: A risk management approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(9), 698-713. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410567478
  • Golan, M. S., Jernegan, L. H., & Linkov, I. (2020). Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: Systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Environment Systems and Decisions, 40, 222-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09777-w
  • Grainger, A. (2014). The WTO trade facilitation agreement: Consulting the private sector. Journal of World Trade, 48(6), 1167-1188.
  • Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003
  • Hallikas, J., Karvonen, I., Pulkkinen, U., Virolainen, V. M., & Tuominen, M. (2004). Risk management processes in supplier networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.007
  • Handfield, R. B., & McCormack, K. (2007). Supply chain risk management: Minimizing disruptions in global sourcing. Auerbach Publications.
  • Handfield, R., & Nichols, E. L. (2004). Key issues in global supply base management. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.007
  • Harrington, L., & O’Connor, J. (2009). How Cisco succeeds at global risk management. Supply Chain Management Review, 13(5), 10-17.
  • Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, 52, 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004
  • Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2005). An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long‐run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x
  • Ivanov, D. (2020). Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136, 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922
  • Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904-2915. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727
  • Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic: Managerial insights and research implications. International Journal of Production Economics, 232, 107921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107921
  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2017). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829-846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086
  • Jiang, B. (2009). The effects of interorganizational governance on supplier’s compliance with SCC: An empirical examination of compliant and non-compliant suppliers. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4), 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.005
  • Jüttner, U., & Maklan, S. (2011). Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111139062
  • Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003). Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 6(4), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560310001627016
  • Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x
  • Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.007
  • Lee, H. L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Review, 44(3), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166135
  • Lemke, F., & Petersen, H. L. (2013). Teaching reputational risk management in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(4), 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2012-0222
  • Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2019). Supply chains and global health: An imperative for bringing operations management scholarship into action. Production and Operations Management, 28(6), 1519-1528. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12999
  • Locke, R., Amengual, M., & Mangla, A. (2009). Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Politics & Society, 37(3), 319-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209338922
  • Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: Where are we now and where are we going? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1796-x
  • Manners-Bell, J. (2021). Supply chain risk management: Understanding emerging threats to global supply chains. Kogan Page Publishers.
  • Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(3), 192-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810866986
  • Matsuo, H. (2015). Implications of the Tohoku earthquake for Toyota’s coordination mechanism: Supply chain disruption of automotive semiconductors. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.010
  • Mulligan, D. K., Koopman, C., & Doty, N. (2019). Privacy is an essentially contested concept: A multi-dimensional analytic for mapping privacy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 377(2133), 20180300. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0300
  • Neiger, D., Rotaru, K., & Churilov, L. (2009). Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.003
  • Ongondo, F. O., Williams, I. D., & Cherrett, T. J. (2011). How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Management, 31(4), 714-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.023
  • Paine, L. S. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 106-117.
  • Peck, H. (2006). Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(2), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560600673578
  • Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x
  • Pickles, J., & Zhu, S. (2013). The California Transparency in Supply Chains Act. Manchester: Capturing the Gains, University of Manchester.
  • Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873
  • Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135. https://doi.org/10.
  • Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
  • Sampaio, P., Saraiva, P., & Guimarães Rodrigues, A. (2009). ISO 9001 certification research: Questions, answers and approaches. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(1), 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910924161
  • Scholten, K., Scott, P. S., & Fynes, B. (2014). Mitigation processes – antecedents for building supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2013-0191
  • Shee, H., Miah, S. J., Fairfield, L., & Pujawan, N. (2018). The impact of cloud-enabled process integration on supply chain performance and firm sustainability: The moderating role of top management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(6), 500-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2017-0309
  • Sheffi, Y., & Rice Jr, J. B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41-48.
  • Simchi-Levi, D., Schmidt, W., & Wei, Y. (2014). From superstorms to factory fires: Managing unpredictable supply chain disruptions. Harvard Business Review, 92(1-2), 96-101.
  • Simchi-Levi, D., Schmidt, W., Wei, Y., Zhang, P. Y., Combs, K., Ge, Y., Gusikhin, O., Sanders, M., & Zhang, D. (2015). Identifying risks and mitigating disruptions in the automotive supply chain. Interfaces, 45(5), 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2015.0804
  • Sodhi, M. S., Son, B. G., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and Operations Management, 21(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01251.x
  • Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006
  • Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.008
  • Thomsen, M. R., & Whelan, A. P. (2014). Export control and sanctions enforcement. The Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation, 47(3), 31-41.
  • Thun, J. H., & Hoenig, D. (2011). An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.010
  • Thun, J. H., Drüke, M., & Hoenig, D. (2011). Managing uncertainty – an empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5511-5525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.563901
  • Tikkinen-Piri, C., Rohunen, A., & Markkula, J. (2018). EU General Data Protection Regulation: Changes and implications for personal data collecting companies. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(1), 134-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.015
  • Tiwari, S., Wee, H. M., & Daryanto, Y. (2018). Big data analytics in supply chain management between 2010 and 2016: Insights to industries. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 115, 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.017
  • Trkman, P., McCormack, K., De Oliveira, M. P. V., & Ladeira, M. B. (2010). The impact of business analytics on supply chain performance. Decision Support Systems, 49(3), 318-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.03.007
  • Tummala, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 474-483. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111171165
  • Unilever. (2020). Unilever Sustainable Living Plan: 10 years on. https://www.unilever.com/planet-and-society/sustainability-reporting-centre/sustainable-living-plan-10-years-on/
  • Wieland, A., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2012). Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(10), 887-905. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211281411
  • Yang, B., Burns, N. D., & Backhouse, C. J. (2004). Postponement: A review and an integrated framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(5), 468-487. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410532542
  • Yüksel, I. (2012). Developing a multi-criteria decision making model for PESTEL analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n24p52
  • Zhu, L., Hurt, K. J., & Biswas, D. (2019). Machine learning and natural language processing for supply chain risk management. In K. D. Lawrence & G. Kleinman (Eds.), Applications of Management Science (pp. 105-121). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0276-897620190000020007
  • Zsidisin, G. A., & Henke, M. (Eds.). (2019). Revisiting supply chain risk. Springer.
  • Zsidisin, G. A., & Ritchie, B. (Eds.). (2009). Supply chain risk: A handbook of assessment, management, and performance. Springer.
  • Zsidisin, G. A., Melnyk, S. A., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management. International Journal of Production Research, 43(16), 3401-3420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500095613
Scroll to Top